<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SARPROZ © | paul | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.sarproz.com/members/paul/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sarproz.com/members/paul/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for paul.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 17:03:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1c4622223df2ebc12c62dba2954f1d09</guid>
				<title>paul started the topic DEM ERROR in the forum Sarproz Forum</title>
				<link>https://www.sarproz.com/groups/sarproz-group/forum/topic/dem-error/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 14:12:43 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good morning,</p>
<p>I checked the automatically downloaded SRTM DEM, and find one of them has serious problem. Please check the &#8216;DEM abnormal 2.jpg&#8217; attached. </p>
<p>However, this problematic DEM covers the area outside of my study area, the four corners of which are marked in &#8216;DEM abnormal.jpg&#8217;.</p>
<p>So my questions, does it matter if leave this problematic&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2378"><a href="https://www.sarproz.com/groups/sarproz-group/forum/topic/dem-error/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">108e7ff4c80c78d7492b94bde459d754</guid>
				<title>paul started the topic Spatial ramp for the distribution of PS points in the forum Sarproz Forum</title>
				<link>https://www.sarproz.com/groups/sarproz-group/forum/topic/spatial-ramp-for-the-distribution-of-ps-points/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 16:25:56 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>When i do PS time series analysis, i got the result as shown in the first figure &#8216;PS overview&#8217;. This figure shows all the PS points with their color rendered by the deformation rate. There is a very obvious spatial ramp pattern that northeast corner shows stronger subsiding while the southwest corner shows much less subsidence trend. It looks&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2372"><a href="https://www.sarproz.com/groups/sarproz-group/forum/topic/spatial-ramp-for-the-distribution-of-ps-points/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4019734bc7fb4d0f37ae9186c09990a4</guid>
				<title>paul replied to the topic Inconsistency of results from different processing steps in the forum Sarproz Forum</title>
				<link>https://www.sarproz.com/groups/sarproz-group/forum/topic/inconsistency-of-results-from-different-processing-steps/#post-3083</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2018 02:01:57 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Daniele,</p>
<p>Thanks for the suggestions.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">31c4f07af2b073d9de26f6d0f924d487</guid>
				<title>paul started the topic Inconsistency of results from different processing steps in the forum Sarproz Forum</title>
				<link>https://www.sarproz.com/groups/sarproz-group/forum/topic/inconsistency-of-results-from-different-processing-steps/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 15:37:29 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>When i am processing Sentinel-1 SLC time series datasets, i encountered with a problem. First, i cropped the study area with 20km radius, and processed the time series with APS (by followed the manual &#8216;Demo on APS&#8230;.&#8217;). Then i geocoded the result and export into Google earth, and the result is shown as attached. The result shows the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2366"><a href="https://www.sarproz.com/groups/sarproz-group/forum/topic/inconsistency-of-results-from-different-processing-steps/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">17954b133686fadaa2fc7561abf281bb</guid>
				<title>paul replied to the topic About coregistration, export kml not aligned with google earth in the forum Sarproz Forum</title>
				<link>https://www.sarproz.com/groups/sarproz-group/forum/topic/about-coregistration-export-kml-not-aligned-with-google-earth/#post-3078</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 14:01:53 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Daniele,</p>
<p>Thank you very much for the suggestions. The coregistration works well now.<br />
I did process the external DEM in SAR coordinates, but i did not choose &#8216;orthorectified&#8217; in data export process, which is important. Besides, the data i am using is Sentinel data.</p>
<p>Have a great day,<br />
Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a1a8bdfd26e4b67b88e4850cfdf5d175</guid>
				<title>paul started the topic About coregistration, export kml not aligned with google earth in the forum Sarproz Forum</title>
				<link>https://www.sarproz.com/groups/sarproz-group/forum/topic/about-coregistration-export-kml-not-aligned-with-google-earth/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 02:31:37 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I am currently dealing with SLC time series, and I need to coregister all images to the master image. I follow the step in the manual. After co-registration I opened SITE-PROCESSING- GCP selection &#8211; Keep current orbits (auto GCP). Then I applied Coregistration Refinedment (Optional). After all of these, I applied Extended Data Export&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2363"><a href="https://www.sarproz.com/groups/sarproz-group/forum/topic/about-coregistration-export-kml-not-aligned-with-google-earth/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1482e3f69f73402b9ccd84e981f65cfd</guid>
				<title>paul replied to the topic Reference point selection in the forum Sarproz Forum</title>
				<link>https://www.sarproz.com/groups/sarproz-group/forum/topic/reference-point-selection/#post-3062</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:55:51 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the information.</p>
<p>It is sentinel-1A data. One interesting thing is that in Site Processing &#8211; APS estimation, i generated the graph, and it gives me 25 auto point, and i chose a &#8216;best&#8217; point with good distribution. Then, i moved to Site Processing -Sparse point processing. When  i checked the distribution of the parameters, there is a&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2344"><a href="https://www.sarproz.com/groups/sarproz-group/forum/topic/reference-point-selection/#post-3062" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">15a1b40f471e4b4995288abbbddcdaf5</guid>
				<title>paul replied to the topic Reference point selection in the forum Sarproz Forum</title>
				<link>https://www.sarproz.com/groups/sarproz-group/forum/topic/reference-point-selection/#post-3060</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:13:47 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for the suggestion. </p>
<p>About the reference point choosing, i still have a question. When i read the SARPROZ tutorial &#8216;Demo: APS Estimation Multitemporal analysis with Sarproz&#8217;, it says that best reference point should reflects that both velocity and residual height distribution peak at 0. However, in the Site Processing &#8211; APS&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2342"><a href="https://www.sarproz.com/groups/sarproz-group/forum/topic/reference-point-selection/#post-3060" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2dec91f7661effcbf6443847d9f985cf</guid>
				<title>paul started the topic Reference point selection in the forum Sarproz Forum</title>
				<link>https://www.sarproz.com/groups/sarproz-group/forum/topic/reference-point-selection/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 13:46:41 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A question about choosing reference point:</p>
<p>The image below is the study (urban) area (central Florida) which features with buildings. My question is about choosing reference point. I studied the online material which says integrated residual height and velocity are supposed to be peak at 0 value. However, there might be that majority of PS are on&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2339"><a href="https://www.sarproz.com/groups/sarproz-group/forum/topic/reference-point-selection/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">78adaef6bdcb4d7d5e80b38b100ac922</guid>
				<title>paul became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://www.sarproz.com/activity/p/2336/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 20:58:48 -0500</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>