Hello everyone,
I would like to ask why the point density derived from PS-InSAR and QPS-InSAR is only slightly different in my results, and in some areas there is almost no difference except for small changes in point locations.
The main processing workflow I used for each method is as follows:
PS-InSAR: one-star image connection, Delaunay graph creation, APS estimation, MISP, and time series analysis.
QPS-InSAR: full-graph image connection, Delaunay graph creation, interferogram processing with Goldstein phase filtering and multilooking, APS inherited from standard PS processing, MISP using coherence as weight, and time series analysis.
Could you please let me know whether I processed anything incorrectly or skipped any important steps that may explain why the PS and QPS results are so similar?
In addition, if I would like to continue with SBAS processing, may I proceed from any of the existing processing steps, or do I need to start the workflow again from the beginning? In other words, is it possible to reuse some results from the PS-InSAR or QPS-InSAR processing, or does SBAS require a completely separate processing chain?
Thank you in advance for your time and guidance.
Attachments:
You must be
logged in to view attached files.