sarproz-group

PSInSAR Result Analysis

This topic contains 1 reply, has 2 voices, and was last updated by  periz 2 years, 3 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #1161

    anarizka
    Participant

    dear prof.Daniele

    Could you give me suggestion and opinion from my PS results?
    1. Why residual height results still rather high? In APS parameter I put -50 x 50

    2. Why thermal expansion is not linear with building height ?
    I have assumption, I dont know it’s true or not.
    -Right side area is more density than left area, so in right area thermal higher than left area.
    -Right area sparse of vegetation than left area

    Best Regards,

    Ana

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
  • #1171

    periz
    Keymaster

    I am afraid this is an overfitting case.
    I suppose you do not have many images, so, in such case I do not suggest you to estimate the thermal expansion.
    Also, keep height and velocity ranges small in the APS estimation.
    Better you remove high points when estimating the APS.
    The APS estimation process should be kept as simple as possible. Later in the sparse points analysis you can estimate more things if the system is stable. But not in the APS.
    If your estimated results (vel dem and so on) look correlated, there is surely something wrong (in the APS inversion you are basically integrating errors…)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.