antig

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 49 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Sentinel 1-C data ingest #8623
    antig
    Participant

      It works fine for me. Maybe your version is old?

      in reply to: Sentinel-1 orbits – new repository (Nov 2023) #7684
      antig
      Participant

        i did not saw any update option in the morning

        in reply to: Sentinel-1 orbits – new repository (Nov 2023) #7656
        antig
        Participant

          Is there any instruction somewhere on where and which files should be placed so that SarProz can find and read them?

          in reply to: Earthquake deformation detection #7484
          antig
          Participant

            Fringes are visible
            Try multilook result Rg 15 Az 5 before UW

            in reply to: APS processing doubts for my project #7421
            antig
            Participant

              APS is long wave length signal. So 0.7 seems fine spatial distribution for aps. In sparse point protssesing u may use lower ASI 0.6 for exaple

              in reply to: lat/lon for each pixel #7084
              antig
              Participant

                Export image that you are interested to geotif
                Then use, for example, gdal to translate tif file to csv. It should be possible to do in Qgis to

                in reply to: Question for Capella products #6865
                antig
                Participant

                  SLC Should work well

                  in reply to: APS Stratification meaning #6360
                  antig
                  Participant

                    DSF is DownSamplingFactor
                    Because APS is low frequency signal then the APS results will be multilooked in that factor

                    in reply to: permanent scatter points on water is ok? #6220
                    antig
                    Participant

                      No, it is not ok

                      in reply to: APS processing #6169
                      antig
                      Participant

                        It is not to mutch information to tell exactly. if You have sentinel 1 images stack, You may use first Smart 5 option (remove thermal manualy). Then You will have data to analyse how big are the movements in AOI

                        in reply to: results from different model in APS #5671
                        antig
                        Participant

                          Additionaly, I suggest to use Graph Analysis and Refinement module. It is between APS and SPP button. There is possible to remove low coherence connections and improve APS graph.

                          in reply to: APS Estimate “Test” Results #5527
                          antig
                          Participant

                            Ho big is Your bridge. If it is less than km You may skip APS and use small area module

                            in reply to: burst lines on interfereograms #5461
                            antig
                            Participant

                              I solved the problem myself.
                              the problem was in coregistration.

                              Firstly I used “only orbits” mode for coregistration.
                              After analyse of Site.log the program had gave warning to that in coregistration has some thing wrong.

                              I tried “Ampl Xcorr” mode for coregistration and it worked match better. No warnings, No Stripe

                              So in future I use “Ampl Xcorr” as default

                              in reply to: Unwrappin APS phase values #5454
                              antig
                              Participant

                                You may set in module “Insar params” appropriate settings
                                Do not filter and multilook interferograms check “Flattening” and “DEM remove”
                                save settings
                                genereate interfereograms in module “interferograms protsessing”

                                in reply to: Orbit heading #4973
                                antig
                                Participant

                                  Thank You Daniele
                                  I understood it now
                                  Agree, that this is weird, but possible, way to illustrate direction.

                                Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 49 total)