mahtab

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Sentinel-1 orbits – new repository (Nov 2023) #7785
    mahtab
    Participant

      Dear Daniele,

      Problem solved! I noticed that I did not put my account information in the advanced parameters for the automatic downloading. I am all set now.

      Thanks,
      Mahtab

      in reply to: Sentinel-1 orbits – new repository (Nov 2023) #7783
      mahtab
      Participant

        Dear Daniele,

        I am using the latest version of the software; however, it still seems automatic downloading does not work for Sentinel-1 orbit files. I have got empty folders of orbits. Is the issue with my case specifically or it has not been implemented yet in the software?
        Just in case I have also attached the log file.

        Best regards,
        Mahtab

        Attachments:
        You must be logged in to view attached files.
        in reply to: No trend shown in exported KML file #6808
        mahtab
        Participant

          Hello,

          You were right, there was a bit difference in the name of the file from the automatic one, that I don’t know how!, but yes the name was the issue!

          Thank you for your helpful hints.

          Best regards,
          Mahtab

          in reply to: No trend shown in exported KML file #6807
          mahtab
          Participant

            Hello again,

            Yes, I know it is not an issue with the software. I thought maybe I am exporting wrongly.
            Thank you for the hints, all answers are yes, same things, but the problem is still there. I need to investigate what is going on afterwards as you mentioned.

            Thank you 🙂

            Best regards,
            Mahtab

            in reply to: ERS data coregistration #5360
            mahtab
            Participant

              Oh Sorry I sent it mistakenly.
              Could you please take a look at the new attachment ? it seems that the DC should be changed to 2.5, right? the warning is because of that?

              Best

              Attachments:
              You must be logged in to view attached files.
              in reply to: ERS data coregistration #5357
              mahtab
              Participant

                However the parameters show a Normal Baseline of about 700m and it doesn’t exceed the default value !!
                Anyway sth is wrong with my data/process and I cannot figure it out. Supposing they are co-registered correctly, when I wanted to make reflectivity map I encountered an error. I attached the log file again.
                Thanks for your help.

                Attachments:
                You must be logged in to view attached files.
                in reply to: ERS data coregistration #5352
                mahtab
                Participant

                  .rar file is not supported. I attached .zip file.

                  Attachments:
                  You must be logged in to view attached files.
                  in reply to: ERS data coregistration #5351
                  mahtab
                  Participant

                    Thanks for your reply.

                    I attached the site.log file. Could you please check it?

                    Thanks in advance

                    in reply to: different color in resampled version of KML scattered #3165
                    mahtab
                    Participant

                      Thanks for your reply.

                      in reply to: different color in resampled version of KML scattered #3160
                      mahtab
                      Participant

                        Both color bars are attached.

                        Attachments:
                        You must be logged in to view attached files.
                        in reply to: different color in resampled version of KML scattered #3157
                        mahtab
                        Participant

                          Thanks for your reply.

                          I zoomed to the maximum resolution but still the colors are different as you can see in the attachment.

                          Attachments:
                          You must be logged in to view attached files.
                          in reply to: Sentinel-1A slave images extraction #2085
                          mahtab
                          Participant

                            Hello Dr. Perissin

                            The problem was because of my data set, one of the images was corrupted. SARPROZ just works fine.

                            Thanks
                            Mahtab

                            in reply to: Life time index for point selection #2051
                            mahtab
                            Participant

                              Hello again

                              Thank You Doctor. I got it. But the Number of selected Points with spatial coherency index is less than ones with Amplitude stab. index.
                              In my case, most of the points have low spatial coherency.

                              Result of selected Points using spatial coherency and amplitude stab. indices with the same threshold are attached here.

                              Attachments:
                              You must be logged in to view attached files.
                            Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)